| Enhancer ID: | E_02_0160 |
| Species: | human |
| Position : | chr8:116842944-116844944 |
| Biosample name: | |
| Experiment class : | High+Lowthroughput |
| Enhancer type: | Enhancer |
| Disease: | -- |
| Pubmed ID: | 31665135 |
| Enhancer experiment: | Flow cytometry,PCR |
| Enhancer experiment description: | Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional. |
| Target gene : | RAD21,CTCF |
| Strong evidence: | qRT-PCR,qPCR,ChIP,3C |
| Less strong evidence: | RNA-Seq |
| Target gene experiment description: | Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional.;Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional. |
| TF name : | -- |
| TF experiment: | Flow cytometry,PCR |
| TF experiment description: | Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional.;Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional. |
| Enhancer function : | Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional. |
| Enhancer function experiment: | Immunohistochemical staining |
| Enhancer function experiment description: |
Similarly, CTCF, RAD21, and H3K4me3 occurred more often at interacting pro_x0002_moters than non-interacting promoters (Fig 7). Taken together, histone marks and relevant factors suggested that our prediction of enhancer-target relationships were likely biologically functional. |
| SNP ID: | -- |
| GeneName | Pathway Name | Source | Gene Number |
|---|